qualitative
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
qualitative [2018/05/28 10:23] – hkimscil | qualitative [2018/05/28 10:29] (current) – hkimscil | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
theory generating activity (induction) | theory generating activity (induction) | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
계량화할 수 없는 연구주제나 사회문제에 유용 | 계량화할 수 없는 연구주제나 사회문제에 유용 | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
< | < | ||
- | </ | + | </ |
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | stage of biological and psychological development. Yet these are virtually the | ||
+ | same for young people in all societies and historical periods. Their patterns of | ||
+ | behavior, however, vary enormously across cultures. This reading offers a sociological | ||
+ | understanding of contemporary American teenagers that focuses on the ways that | ||
+ | adults have organized the formal structures of young people’s lives and in turn how | ||
+ | they have responded to these structures by creating their own informal forms of | ||
+ | social organization. Th e core of this informal organization is a peer status system that | ||
+ | strongly shapes their behavior. Moreover, the analysis shows that rather than being | ||
+ | exceptional or bizarre, teenage behaviors are very similar to those of people in other | ||
+ | status systems. Teenage culture in the U.S. has, however, played a relatively unique | ||
+ | and important role in encouraging consumerism in the broader society</ | ||
Joe Lofland Analyzing Social Settings, 2006 | Joe Lofland Analyzing Social Settings, 2006 |
qualitative.1527470586.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/28 10:23 by hkimscil