c:mrm:2019:schedule
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| c:mrm:2019:schedule [2019/05/13 08:09] – [Week 11: (May 13, 15)] hkimscil | c:mrm:2019:schedule [2019/06/05 07:25] (current) – [Week 6: Research (April 8, 10)] hkimscil | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 296: | Line 296: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ||
| - | * Sampling 표집 | + | * [[:Sampling]] 표집 |
| * 역사: | * 역사: | ||
| * Alfred M. Landon | Literary Digest | Presidential candidate | 1916년 여론조사 (Woodrow Wilson vs. Charles Hughes) 예측 | 이후 매 4년마다 정확한 예측 | 1936년 예측: 전화번호부 + 자동차소유주 명부 -> 1천만명 중 2백만명 응답 (22% 회수율 혹은 응답률) | Landon 57 vs Roosebelt 43 | Roosebelt 61 | | * Alfred M. Landon | Literary Digest | Presidential candidate | 1916년 여론조사 (Woodrow Wilson vs. Charles Hughes) 예측 | 이후 매 4년마다 정확한 예측 | 1936년 예측: 전화번호부 + 자동차소유주 명부 -> 1천만명 중 2백만명 응답 (22% 회수율 혹은 응답률) | Landon 57 vs Roosebelt 43 | Roosebelt 61 | | ||
| Line 475: | Line 475: | ||
| * state the level of measurement (NOIR) | * state the level of measurement (NOIR) | ||
| * What kinds of method did the authors take for the measurement? | * What kinds of method did the authors take for the measurement? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * What kinds of data do you think you require for the project (그룹프로젝트)? | ||
| + | * explain how you are going to measure. | ||
| Line 484: | Line 488: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| ==== Assignment ==== | ==== Assignment ==== | ||
| - | * 자기 조의 연구주제 확정하고 | ||
| - | * 주제와 관련된 선행연구 조사, 정리하기 | ||
| - | * 이와 관련지어 연구문제 혹은 가설을 확정하기 | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| ===== Week 13: Some Others (Clustering, | ===== Week 13: Some Others (Clustering, | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Quiz at the second class of the week 14. | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ||
| * [[:Social Network Analysis]] | * [[:Social Network Analysis]] | ||
| Line 503: | Line 506: | ||
| <fc # | <fc # | ||
| __강의 내용__ | __강의 내용__ | ||
| - | * from [[# | + | * from week 2 (social science and theories) |
| - | * Sampling . . . | + | * 4가지 이론적 접근방법들 |
| - | * Research Question | + | * 소개된 이론들 |
| - | * Hypothesis | + | * decoy effect |
| - | * Conceptualization | + | * the third person effect |
| - | * 지표, 차원 | + | * the elaboration likelihood model |
| - | * Level of measurement: | + | * cognitive disorder |
| - | * NOIR | + | * agenda setting |
| - | * Lickert | + | * etc. |
| - | * Semantic Differential | + | |
| - | * 쌍대비교척도 | + | |
| - | * Reliability | + | |
| - | * Validity | + | |
| - | * Research Design | + | |
| - | * Survey | + | |
| - | * Experiment | + | |
| - | __텍스트북__ | + | |
| - | * 5장 | + | |
| - | * 약사 | + | |
| - | * non-probability | + | |
| - | * probability | + | |
| - | * poputation and sample frame | + | |
| * sampling | * sampling | ||
| - | * CLT + sampling distribution + sampling error | + | * introduction to the social networks analysis |
| - | * 6장 | + | * Research Question |
| - | * 2. 존재하는 것의 측정 | + | * Hypothesis |
| - | * 3. 개념화 | + | * Conceptualization |
| - | * 6. 측정의 질 | + | * Level of measurement: |
| - | * 7장 | + | * NOIR |
| - | * 2. 지수 대 척도 | + | * Lickert |
| - | * < | + | * Semantic Differential |
| - | * 4. 척도의 구성 | + | * 쌍대비교척도 |
| - | * 8장 | + | * Reliability |
| - | * 2. 적합한 주제 | + | * Validity |
| - | * 3. 질문작성 | + | * < |
| - | * 4. 설문지 구성 | + | * < |
| - | * 5. 자기기입식: | + | * < |
| - | * 8. 온라인서베이 | + | * Research ethics |
| - | * 9. 서베이방법들 간의 비교 | + | * 강의내용 |
| - | * 10. 장단점 | + | |
| - | * 11. 이차분석 | + | |
| - | * 9장 | + | |
| - | * 2. 적절한 주제 | + | |
| - | * 3. 고전적 실험 | + | |
| - | * 4. 피험자 선정 | + | |
| - | * 5. 다양한 실험설계 | + | |
| - | * 7. 대안적 심험상황 | + | |
| - | * 8. 장점과 단점 | + | |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 560: | Line 540: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| ==== Assignment ==== | ==== Assignment ==== | ||
| + | Assignment final (group) | ||
| + | * Layout the outline of your research works - as found in research articles you have read. The outline should be similar to the below. | ||
| + | * Introduction | ||
| + | * define the research problem | ||
| + | * introduce the related theories and ideas | ||
| + | * sum up what you are going to study | ||
| + | * Reviewing previous (related) studies | ||
| + | * review articles and research works that are related to your research works. | ||
| + | * related the works to your research | ||
| + | * what are the shortfalls of the studies; | ||
| + | * how they have (not) been dealt with by others; | ||
| + | * why my(our) research works are important in relation to this line of works | ||
| + | * Propose research questions or build hypotheses | ||
| + | * propose research questions based on the review section or build hypotheses | ||
| + | * articulate the research questions and hypotheses | ||
| + | * based on the previous reviews and the relative theories | ||
| + | * Research design | ||
| + | * data gathering and methods of analyses | ||
| + | * how you are going to gather the data; | ||
| + | * survey | ||
| + | * survey questionnaires | ||
| + | * experiment | ||
| + | * describe the experiment method | ||
| + | * other data gathering methods | ||
| + | * describe how you are going to get the data | ||
| + | * measuring the concepts and ideas (if necessary) | ||
| + | * Analyses | ||
| + | * discuss how you are going to analyze the data | ||
| + | * discuss anticipating results and | ||
| + | * articulate how they are important in terms of this line of reserach works | ||
| + | * References | ||
| + | * list references in APA style format | ||
| + | * you should also cite articles (in the assignment body) in APA style (please refer to the https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | please refer to the below articles | ||
| + | * 권혁남. (2018). 이슈 특성과 지각된 의견분위기 상황에 따른 침묵의 나선효과. 사회과학연구, | ||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
c/mrm/2019/schedule.1557702583.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/05/13 08:09 by hkimscil